|
AMS 2341 Reading Questions
Questions for Tues. 14 Oct.
1. What's the argument of the exhibit, Lewis
and Clark: The National Bicentennial Exhibition? That is, what is
it's goal or purpose? What message does it hope visitors will walk away
with?
2. What's the argument of the exhibit, Rivers,
Edens, Empires: Lewis and Clark and the Revealing of America?
What goal or purpose motivated it? How does it hope to influence
viewers?
3. What is Kimberly Lamm's (the reviewer's)
argument ABOUT each of these exhibits? What does she think they
succeed/fail at and why?
4. Are you convinced by Lamm's argument? Why or
why not? Does the evidence she offers support her case?
Questions for Thurs. 16 Oct.
- Jacobson argues that the 1790 law making
citizenship a possibility for all “free white persons” (men) was
increasingly challenged in the mid-nineteenth-century by ideas about
“white races” (plural). What were some of the white races?
Do we still recognize any of them as distinct races? Why or why
not?
- Why did many “Anglo-Saxon” Americans find the
Irish unfit for citizenship? What characteristics were invoked to
justify discrimination against the Irish?
- Why were Italians in New Orleans called “white
niggers”? Explain why “whiter” Americans classed Italians with
black folks.
- Leo Frank, a Jew, was lynched in Georgia in
1915. What happened in the Frank case? Why/how did he end up
suffering a fate more common to black men in the South during that
period?
- The Johnson Act of 1924 restricted
immigration. According to what rules/guidelines was immigration
restricted? Why did so many legislators sign on to vote for this
bill?
Questions for Tues. 21 Oct.
- How is “Caucasian” different from “white”?
Why did those who were ambiguously white in the nineteenth century
become unproblematically Caucasian by the middle of the twentieth?
What social and cultural changes explain this shift in ways of
thinking about race?
- What does it mean to suggest that “culture
eclipsed biology as the prime determinant of the social behavior of
races”? (98). Explain this transition in your own words.
- Official statements about race from UNESCO and
others in the 1940s insisted there were how many races? What were
they? How many races do we believe there are now? What are they?
How do we know this?
- What factors explain how racialist thinking in
America after 1924 came to be focused on the black/white dyad in
ways it was not in the nineteenth century? What was the effect on
black folks? On white ethnics?
Questions for Thurs. 23 Oct.
1. Woman Warrior starts with the narrator
telling us a story her mother told her not to tell. What's the lesson
she's supposed to get from the story (i.e why did her mom tell it to
her)? What is the lesson she actually takes from it? Why tell it (in
print) to so many other people? What's the lesson readers ought to take
from it?
2. What genre is this book? Novel?
Autobiography? Short story collection? Memoir? fantasy/myth? Why do
you think so? If it fits in several categories, what is the effect of
writing that challenges our categories for thinking about literature?
3. "White Tigers" is often anthologized on its own
in women's literature or women's studies anthologies. Why do you think
so? Why would this story be more popular than the others? What kinds
of themes/ideas does it illustrate?
4. What does Woman Warrior suggest about
the narrator's Chinese history/tradition? Does it make sense to her?
Does it give her strength, power, and community, or does it destroy her
self-esteem and make her an outsider, or does it do some of both?
Explain your answer.
Questions for Tues. 28 Oct.
1. Compare the mother in "Shaman" to the mother in
the last 2 sections of the book. How does her character and her life
compare in China vs. in the U.S.? Give specific examples.
2. Think about all the references to ghosts,
including the subtitle. Who are the ghosts? What does their presence
suggest about history, memory, ancestry, and tradition? What it is real
and what isn't?
3. There are lots of images/references to silence
and voice in Woman Warrior, esp. in the final section , "A Song
for the Barbarian Reedpipe." What is Kingston trying to communicate
about silence and voice for Chinese-American women, or for women more
generally? Why do you think so? What do you make of the song for the
barbarian reedpipe that ends the book?
4. Why have male, Chinese critics been so angry
about this book? What do they think Kingston has done to them or to
their community in writing it? Are they right? Why or why not?
5. List stereotypes about Chinese/Asian men and
women that circulate(d) in the U.S. What are the historical sources of
these stereotypes? How might they explain the positions Jeffrey Paul
Chan and Frank Chin take about the work of Kingston and other
Chinese-American writers (esp. women)?
Questions for Thurs. 30 Oct.
1. Roediger argues, "Chattel slavery provided
white workers with a touchstone against which to weigh their fears and a
yardstick to measure their reassurance" (66). What does he mean by
this? What were their fears? What kind of reassurance did they get?
2. Roediger repeatedly links the demands and
aspirations of artisans, mechanics, and other white workers with
Republicanism (or herrenvolk republicanism). How were the
identities of "worker" and "citizen" related? What kind of working
conditions did a man require, in order to meet his obligations to the
state? Why did he think these conditions were necessary? Could
democracy and wage labor coexist? Why or why not?
3. Glickman insists that the "American Standard of
Living" was related to the health and welfare of the republic. What WAS
the "American Standard of Living," and how was it related to
citizenship?
4. What was labor's "consumerist turn" (223,
225)? How did the focus of labor leaders' change during this period
(from what to what)? Why did this transition happen at this particular
time (1880-1925)?
5. Women, black folks, and the Chinese were seen
as threats to working-class solidarity and survival. Why? How did each
place themselves or get placed by others outside the "American Standard
of Living."
6. Does this debate over wages, living conditions,
race and immigration sound familiar to you? Can you think of
contemporary examples that use similar kinds of rhetoric? Give specific
examples.
Questions for Thurs. 6 Nov.
1. What is "working ladyhood," and why did it
matter (i.e. why did working-class, immigrant women work so hard and
spend so much money trying to achieve it? What did they hope to signify
through achieving this status)?
2. What is a dime novel, and why did so many
working-class women buy them? What role did these cheap stories fulfill
in their lives?
3. Why were fashionable, stylish clothes so
important to working women? What kinds of meanings were attached to
dressing well by these women? What did middle-class reformers think
about this interest in fashion? Why?
4. Describe the plot of a typical dime-novel
romance. Why would these kinds of stories be interesting and compelling
to working women? Do these stories sound like any contemporary popular
narratives? If so, what narratives? If not, why not (i.e. how are
women's popular narratives different now and why)?
5. Why was the use of cosmetics problematic for many women in
nineteenth-century America? What were the criticisms made of
cosmetic use?
6. What are the three markets for cosmetics? Where did
each emerge from, and how was their historical development different?
Museum
Review Paper
Literary Analysis Paper
|