|
Introduction: |
Creating an Integrated Science Learning Environment, Dr.
Rebekah Nix |
Today's Educational Environment
The ISLE program encompasses an emergent model for developing an integrated
learning environment to accomplish the goals set forth for today’s science
educators and their students. Combining an Internet-based virtual field trip
product with an extended field trip to a natural area offered a unique framework
to address the specific needs of multilevel inservice and preservice science
teachers, and the increasingly diverse audience of learners they served.

In March 1998, it was reported that a new website was created every four
seconds. You’ll just have to check the web to find out how much that has
increased with the advent of blogs, and wikis, and the like! The
‘information explosion’ has resulted in the creation of massive amounts of bits
of data reinforcing the misconception that science is simply a collection of
facts and figures with little relevance to the everyday lives of individuals and
societies. Building on the explosion imagery, the increase of information on the
World Wide Web is consequently non-linear in nature. This poses an interesting
challenge to classroom teachers, as well as teacher educators, on a global
scale. Science teachers, in particular, teeter on the apex of this
rapidly-advancing wave and must find effective ways to balance issues and manage
change in the classroom.
Educational Reform on a Global Scale
Recent technological advances have created an awareness of the global
community and provide graphic examples of the impact of individuals and the
inter-relatedness of systems and societies. The impact on education has been
tremendous, rapidly transforming the proverbial one-room schoolhouse into a
global system without limitations. As such, the new emphasis on information
processing has spawned some instructive and educationally relevant findings.
Advances in information technology are creating entirely new pedagogical
possibilities. The call for change has been issued on a worldwide scale.
Fraser, in his 1997 presidential address to the National Association for
Research in Science Teaching (NARST), highlighted the importance of the
expansion, internationalization and cross-nationalization to this educational
research organization. "New technologies facilitate a shift from communication
isolation and deprivation to communication access and exchange" (SEDL, 2000, ¶
3). Also evidenced by the abundance of new publications, increased interest in
both teaching and learning combined with the political and social attention to
education on a global scale has supported similarly rapid and significant
advances in learning environments research specifically. New approaches and
methodologies are being developed in direct response to the effects of the
information revolution.
Clearly, education has been pulled into a new realm. Information technology
in science education is quite real. Our job as citizens of this now global
community is to place these tools and resources into the proper context and
provide sufficient support to all learners, especially today’s teachers. The
possibilities are indeed endless. Tomorrow’s educators must be involved in the
development of a new model for science education. We will realize the potential
of information technology in science education today by approaching the
challenges just as our children will have to face the issues of tomorrow. We are
all simply learning by doing. Incorporating information technology in
educational reform efforts has fostered a global learning community. Increasing
collaboration among classroom teachers, science education professors, and
graduate students is already helping individual elementary school teachers to
change their science teaching practices. The same can be done to help teacher
education programs address the needs of practicing classroom teachers.
Implications of the ISLE Model
In a speech delivered to university students and their
parents, instructors, and administrators, Fraser (2001) presented “compelling
evidence that the classroom environment so strongly influences student outcomes
that it should not be ignored by those wishing to improve the effectiveness of
schools and universities” (p. 2). Consisting of more than content and outcomes,
the curriculum of schools and universities includes unexpected places and
spontaneous ways in which the business of learning can take place. Fraser (2001)
eloquently concluded that: “It is the quality of life lived in the classrooms
that determines many of the things that we hope for from education – concern for
community, concern for others, commitment to the task in hand” (p. 2). Because
the ISLE instructors changed the teachers’ learning environment in Phase I, the
ISLE teachers’ were able to improve each of their students’ classroom learning
environments in Phase II.
In the ISLE model, a process approach to information
technology practically illustrated how, when combined, separate parts that
typically work independently can be combined to realize effective applications
in the real-world. The significance of this internalization of concepts and
principles was recognised in the Montgomery County Public Schools, where a
change in philosophy during the last 10 years began slowly from the bottom up.
“A few teachers learned about constructivist theory and began advocating
restructuring of curriculum and instructional practice. Word spread. More
teachers began attending conferences and workshops. As interest grew, retraining
sessions were conducted. Teachers made great changes because they wanted to, not
because they were required to do so” (Matusevich, 1995, ¶ 11).
Conclusions
The ISLE model provided a catalyst for educational change.
Like train-the-trainer programs, the ISLE multiplied the power of actual
scientific field experience through an educationally-sound, globally-available,
virtual field trip product. The actual university/field trip course enabled
teachers to understand the concepts and learn the techniques of constructivism.
These skills and insights were internalized by each
individual, as well as the whole team. By establishing a networked community of
like-minded individuals, transfer of theory and practice is more readily
implemented in the geographically separate school settings. As the ISLE teachers
implement more and more constructivist learning opportunities in their
classrooms, other teachers throughout the school are likely to begin to see and
hear and feel the effects of such change. The virtual field trip provided a
means for these second-generation ISLE teachers to implement constructivist
teaching through the same foundation as the actual ISLE teachers. Thus, a true
mentor relationship is formed and the community is further expanded; thereby, a
single teacher might effectively influence an entire district, as this approach
is transferred to other science lessons and across disciplines.
Building on fundamental coursework in science, society,
and technology, participants directly interacted with renowned experts and
specialists. The principles of hands-on inquiry and teacher-as-researcher
transferred directly into the classroom as students observed and participated in
diverse educational settings. Real-world experience integrated the core concepts
of science with the subtleties of pedagogy that sprung from allowing students to
construct their own knowledge.
Virtual field trips, based on the ISLE model, enable the
principles of student-centered inquiry and constructivism to be practiced for the
benefit of all styles and ages of learners. Why are geology students required
to complete field camp or medical students required to perform internships?
Because the real world is where theory and practice come together and science
becomes relevant, making sense that leads to understanding.
Fraser, B.J. (2001). Twenty thousand hours. Learning Environments
Research, 4, 1-5.
Matusevich, M.N. (1995, May). School reform: What role can technology
play in a constructivist setting? Montgomery Public Schools. [Online].
Available: http://pixel.cs.vt.edu/edu/fis/techcons.html.
SEDL. (2000). Reaching out with technology: Louisiana’s innovative
practices in educational technology. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational
Development Laboratory.
[Online]. Available:http://www.sedl.org/rural/seeds/louisiana/call.html.
To that end, let’s look at what you’re going to
do for this course…