Earmolds
![]()
![]()
Acoustic Impedance
______ to the flow of acoustic energy through an element which results in a _______ of energy
Impedance
This happens in two ways:
|
|
energy is temporarily stored within an element and then returned to the source |
(______ impedance)
|
|
energy is dissipated through conversion to heat (________ impedance) |
Total Acoustic Impedance
Determined by the interaction between
Acoustic resistance (_____ across frequency)
| Acoustic reactance (_____ with frequency) |
Acoustic Resistance
each other
sides of a tube
other obstacles
(such as sintered
pellets, lambs wool, mesh screens)
acoustic energy is dissipated as heat
When a _______ of air is set into motion as a unit without undergoing significant compression (such as in tubing, vents, diaphragm or rec)
impedance of mass of air
~ length of tube ~ 1/diameteracts as low pass device
Acoustic __________When air particles enclosed in a cavity are _________ and __________ but do not move as a unit such as...
the cavity in front of the earphone
diaphragm the cavity drilled for the snap ring
in the receiver mold
the cavity of air beyond the tip of the earmold
Impedance due to acoustic compliance~volume (imped ^ as vol ^) Acts as high pas device (imped ^ as freq decreases) Acoustic _________Occurs when the ________ to the flow of energy is minimal
Types in Earmold
Coupling System
|
|
________ |
|
|
Helmholtz |
|
|
Combination of wavelength and Helmholtz |
SUMMARY OF COUPLING EFFECTS |
||||||||||||||
| Component | Type of element | Ways it can Vary | Effect | |||||||||||
| Dampers (mesh screen, sinted pellets) | Resistive | Placement in tubing System | Smooths out the response | |||||||||||
| Degree of resistance (in ohms) | Reduces overall SLP (Fig. 9, Cox) | |||||||||||||
| Cavity of air beyond earmold tip | Reactive compliance | As earmold canal portion lengthened, | As volume decreases, SPL increases & | |||||||||||
| cavity volume decreases | resonant peak moves down (Fig. 4 Cox) | |||||||||||||
| Cavity in front of receiver in snap ring | Reactive compliance | May increase in volume | As vol increases get peaked response & | |||||||||||
| lower high freq cutoff (Fig. 4.13 Leavitt) | ||||||||||||||
| Tubing | Reactive Inertance | Diameter | As diameter decreases SPL decreases & | |||||||||||
| resonance peak R1 moves down | ||||||||||||||
| Fig. 3 Cox; Fig. 4.12, Leavitt | ||||||||||||||
| Length | As length decreases, resonant peak moves | |||||||||||||
| up, greater high-freq cutoff, but reduced SPL | ||||||||||||||
| (Fig. 4 Cox; Fig. 4.11, Leavitt) | ||||||||||||||
| Vents | Reactive Inertance | Type-Sidebranch/Parallel | Sidebranch reduces high freq response | |||||||||||
| as well as low (Fig. 4.17, Leavitt; Fig 16 Cox) | ||||||||||||||
| Diameter/Length | As diameter increases & length decreases | |||||||||||||
| more low frequency reduction (Table 4.2 | ||||||||||||||
| Leavitt, Fig. 24/25 Cox) | ||||||||||||||
| Open molds | Reactive Inertance | Length of tubing | As length decreases more low frequency | |||||||||||
| reduction. Resonant peak moves up | ||||||||||||||
| (Fig. 28, Cox) | ||||||||||||||
| Diamter of tubing | As diameter decreases SPL & resonance | |||||||||||||
| peak R1 moves down (Fig. 29, Cox) | ||||||||||||||
| Leavitt, Ron (1968). "Earmold: Acoustic and Structural Considerations" in Wm. Hodgson ed. Hearing Aid Assessment | ||||||||||||||
| and Use in Audiologic Habilitation, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. | ||||||||||||||